Search for: "United States v. Ortega" Results 61 - 80 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2013, 10:11 am by Rekha Arulanantham
District Court in Phoenix issued a 142-page decision against Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) in Ortega Melendres v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 6:29 pm by Jeff Welty
United States: “Whether the Supreme Court should overrule the ‘separate sovereigns’ exception to the double jeopardy clause. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 4:08 am by SHG
E.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:05 am
Citing People v Weaver (12 NY3d 433) and United States v Jones (132 S Ct 945, the Court of Appeals ruled that the State's action was a search within the meaning of the State and Federal Constitutions but that under the relevant facts in this case “did not require a warrant. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:46 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Crack Cocaine Dealer Loses Bid for Resentencing Pursuant to Crack, Powder Guidelines Disparity United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:39 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:27 am by Amy Howe
” And when attorney Randolph Ortega, representing Mesa, emphasized that the United States could prosecute Mesa in the United States for violating his orders, Sotomayor retorted that such a prosecution wouldn’t provide any compensation to Hernández’s family for the emotional distress that they had suffered. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
United States Issue: Whether the holding in Roe v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 am by Matt C. Bailey
However, as discussed in my previous post (here), this very line of reasoning was deemed an abuse of discretion by the Ninth Circuit in United Steel v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 8:43 am by Anna Salvatore, Tia Sewell
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared an episode of the National Security Law Podcast about the latest developments in the TikTok lawsuit and the Justice Department and the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]