Search for: "United States v. Ostrer" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
Ostrer had standing in this case, because only he met the three requirements for standing outlined in Lujan v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
Ostrer had standing in this case, because only he met the three requirements for standing outlined in Lujan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 7:38 am by Robert Cook-Deegan
  It is clear that the patent rights in this case have affected who can get tested, how testing is conducted in the United States, and who owns and controls the information that results from genetic tests. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:23 am by Eugene Volokh
[In a phone call], Elder Van Donselaar stated, "Edouard is more repentant than any of the women will ever be. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:09 am
It was for the legislature to change the law and the established practise of the USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) if it wished to treat isolated DNA differently from other compositions of matter to account for its perceived special function. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:28 pm
The Declaratory Judgment Act provides that, "In a case of actual controversy within its jurisdiction . . . any court of the United States . . . may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party seeking such declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be sought. [read post]