Search for: "United States v. PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY"
Results 1 - 20
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
Procter & Gamble Co., 386 U.S. 568, 575 (1967). [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
FTC Chair Lina Khan previewed this in June, stating that “The word ‘efficiency’ doesn’t appear anywhere in the antitrust statutes. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Postmaster Gen. of United States (6th Cir. 2019) ("Harm to reputation is insufficient to overcome the strong presumption in favor of public access…"); Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
NLRB v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:07 pm
Background: The Grudging Acceptance of Merger Efficiencies Not long ago, economically literate antitrust teachers in the United States enjoyed poking fun at such benighted 1960s Supreme Court decisions as Procter & Gamble (following in the wake of Brown Shoe andPhiladelphia National Bank). [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:30 am
In August 2016, she placed the photograph—which has a pending copyright registration in the United States—on her Instagram page, accompanied by a copyright notice. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:59 am
Applications for hashtag trademarks continue to soar, with over 1,042 hashtag trademark applications in 2015 in the United States alone. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 9:09 am
The Procter & Gamble Commercial Company, 228 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 5:52 am
Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
On May 26, 2015, the Solicitor General’s office responded to the United States Supreme Court’s Oct. 14, 2014 invitation for the government’s views on the certioraripetition filed in Athena Cosmetics, Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
SJS/TEN is somewhat analogous in our sandbox to mesothelioma in asbestos cases, since plaintiffs often work backwards from the diagnosis to look for some drug company to sue. [read post]
14 May 2015, 2:15 pm
Kim, that under United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
” Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
Procter & Gamble Distrib., LLC, 766 F.3d 1296 (11th Cir. 2014). [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 10:00 am
& Pat.App. 1961) and first applied, albeit not by name, in Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 8:30 am
Ohio); and Procter & Gamble Company v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:34 pm
& Pat.App. 1961) and first applied, albeit not by name, in Procter & Gamble Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
Rajaratnam's co-conspirators, Rajat Gupta, the former Managing Director of McKinsey & Company and board member at Goldman Sachs and Procter & Gamble, was convicted on four of six counts by a federal jury in New York on June 15, 2012 for providing nonpublic material information to Mr. [read post]
