Search for: "United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 53
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2021, 10:00 am by Dirk Auer
Stigler assumes the underlying goods are neither substitutes nor complements: Stigler, George J. (1963) “United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am by Scott Hervey
Paramount Pictures that was discussed in a previous article, and there was the false light claim made in Olivia De Havilland v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am by Scott Hervey
Paramount Pictures that was discussed in a previous article, and there was the false light claim made in Olivia De Havilland v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
United States, 509 U.S. 544, 550, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993), quoting M. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Collateral estoppel and res judicata protect litigants from repetitive lawsuits, promotes judicial economy, and preserves the integrity of the judicial system (Paramount Pictures Corp. v Allianz Risk Transfer AG, 31 NY3d 64, 73 [2018] [Paramount]). [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Golden advances these allegations on behalf of an alleged class of similarly situated individuals who have declared bankruptcy since 2005 across the United States, with loans originated or serviced by the Defendants. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:23 am by Eugene Volokh
[In a phone call], Elder Van Donselaar stated, "Edouard is more repentant than any of the women will ever be. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am by Ron Coleman
Applicant maintained that the dominant portion of his design is the map of Africa, while in the cited mark the map of the United States is dominant, that the cited design suggests that Africa dominates the United States, and that the alteration of his design to fit the United States outline within the map of Africa profoundly changes the commercial impression of his mark as compared to the cited mark. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 6:38 am by Joy Waltemath
Member Pearce filed a separate dissenting opinion (Local 58, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), AFL–CIO (Paramount Industries, Inc.), February 10, 2017). [read post]