Search for: "United States v. Parisi"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2008, 4:09 pm
Parisi v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:49 am
In Parisi v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:16 am
By Sean Kirby and Rachel Tischler* On March 21, 2013, the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Parisi v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
Two rulings by state courts illustrate this point, Croman v City University of New York, 277 AD2d 185, and Parisi v NYC Housing Authority, Appellate Division, First Department, 269 AD2d 210. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 2:24 am
Rather, the loser’s recourse is to commence a de novo law suit under the national law of its jurisdiction, which in the case of the United States would be a claim under the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, [specifically, §1125(d) of the Lanham Act]. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 2:29 am
Rather, the loser’s recourse is to commence a de novo law suit under the national law of its jurisdiction which, in the case of the United States would be a claim under the Lanham Act. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 11:19 am
The Role of the Courts: Stare Decisis in Constitutional Cases and Under State Law --Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:14 pm
United States Tobacco Co. 17 Sup. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
(Parisi v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
United States of America, et al. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:46 pm
In state and Federal courts throughout the country, the defense and plaintiffs’ bars are debating the application of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:00 pm
Parisi, ___ N.C. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:00 am
In addition, in Parisi v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 2:45 pm
” Parisi v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:25 pm
Hoehn, No. 11-16751 (9th Cir.) - United States v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:04 am
K 487 E3 P765 2011 Production of legal rules / edited by Francesco Parisi. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
Taken by itself and out of context, the question "Is it acceptable that the European Union abandons its powers in favour of the Member States? [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (‘‘it is an old observation that the training of Anglo–American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legislation’’); Parke–Davis & Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 7:03 am
’” Quoting United States v. [read post]