Search for: "United States v. Park" Results 1 - 20 of 3,045
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (Sovereign Immunity; Federal Torts Claim Act) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlPeople in Interest of K.C. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am by Schachtman
Federal and State Prosecutions against Physicians and Screening Companies After Judge Jack’s exposé of fraudulent and false diagnoses in the silicosis MDL, various news media reported that the United States Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York was investigating possible criminal charges against the physicians and lawyers who orchestrated the screenings. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Res judicata applies even to claims that were not litigated if they were or could have been raised previously (Wilson, 29 NY3d at 1062; see Munroe v Park Ave. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:04 am by Eric Goldman
If social media services are the same as streets and parks, the logical implication is that they should be subject to equivalent legal treatment as state action. [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, sec. 4 of the draft Order says that "It is the policy of the United States that large social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, as the functional equivalent of a traditional public forum, should not infringe on protected speech. [read post]
27 May 2020, 8:31 am by Bryan Hawkins
However, the United States Supreme Court did not adopt that analysis in Navarette v California. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
United States Law.com had a piece “Devin Nunes’ Defamation Case Against CNN Transferred to Manhattan Federal Court”. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:22 am by Jan von Hein
Under international maritime law, states have a duty to take appropriate measures for ships flying under their flag to ensure safety at sea (Article 94 (3) of the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea). [read post]
Los Altos denied the SB 35 application with a letter stating the project was inconsistent with parking standards, but without identifying the specific parking standards or any documents containing those standards. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The site is owned by the federal government (government) and managed by the United States National Park Service (NPS). [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
As we all know, Twitter isn’t a state actor: While Twitter no doubt provides a valuable public forum, one in which millions of users, including the President of the United States, participate in wide-ranging public discourse, this alone is insufficient to establish that Twitter is a state actor. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]