Search for: "United States v. Park" Results 81 - 100 of 3,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2017, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
The combination of the MIA, King, Parks, and a united African-American community made the boycott a success. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:10 am by NCC Staff
The combination of the MIA, King, Parks, and a united African-American community made the boycott a success. [read post]
28 May 2011, 9:21 am by Amy Burns
(In the Court’s opinion, for example, Justice Breyer notes that one can go to Fenway Park with the intent of seeing the Red Sox, even if they are not playing that day and there is thus very little chance of actually seeing them play.) [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
United States Department of the Interior, (DC Cir., Aug. 6, 2010), the D.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:17 am
Yesterday, the plaintiffs and defendants filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California a proposed class action settlement in Shields v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:44 pm by Ryan Harvey
Judge Moore and Judge Kethledge fought both a legal battle and a snark battle in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 7:26 pm by Patricia Salkin
Although the court’s analysis of the prior restraint claim noted that regulation lacked a close nexus to expression, the court could have disposed of the case by reviewing it under United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
The combination of the MIA, King, Parks, and a united African-American community made the boycott a success. [read post]