Search for: "United States v. Parlor" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2019, 11:56 pm by Matt Pavich
Case date: 01 April 2019 Case number: No. 18-3596 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:59 am by Amy Howe
At his Harmless Error blog, Luke Rioux discusses last month’s decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:46 am
Judge Sack dissented, in part because of the publicity issue, which he thought violated the Due Process Clause of the Constitution.The decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
 D E C I S I O N Because, in this prostitution investigation, the government engaged in outrageous conduct in violation of the guarantees of due process in the United States and Minnesota constitutions when the investigating officer initiated and permitted the escalation of sexual contact that was unnecessary to any reasonable investigation, appellant’s conviction is reversed. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:35 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The police found the drugs by accident, and defendant got nailed.The case is United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 2:58 pm
Here is the essence of United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 4:41 am
And while he seems more open to embracing a positive vision of race and thinking about the state's inevitable role in constructing identity, his vision may also be more tied to context and less generalizable across cases.In my view, the story of Kennedy's opinion in the desegregation cases began not with Bakke or Grutter, but with a voting-rights decision issued last year in a case called League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:35 am by Thomas Key
Let's explore the ruling of the court concerning these punctuation pizza parlors in Imapizza LLC v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
To achieve the vital goal of substantially reforming existing food systems in the United States in the context of changing climatic, political, and sociolegal conditions, the panelists will articulate their visions of the centrality of interracial justice to confronting food oppression and cultivating Furthering Liberty for People With Disabilities Post- Meyer v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 12:22 pm by Ross Honig and Jordan Ehrlich
On November 25, 2020, Justice Ronnie Abrams of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision in Melendez, et al. v. [read post]