Search for: "United States v. Parsons"
Results 1 - 20
of 131
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
On 19 April 2024, Farbey J handed down judgement in the case of Parsons v Atkinson [2024] EWHC 888 (KB) in favour of the defendant. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
United States On 11 April 2024, the Colorado Court of Appeals found that Section 230 immunity applied to two retweets from Donald Trump and his son about a Dominion Voting employee that said he was going to make sure Trump would not win the 2020 election, Coomer v Donald J. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
United States The United States District Court for the Northern District of California issued its decision to grant the Center for Countering Digital Hate’s (CCDH) motion to strike out under an anti-SLAPP statute in the case of X CCDH. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The hospital’s chief executive stated that “all appropriate regulatory and disciplinary steps will be taken and Kensington Palace confirmed that the report was “a matter for the London Clinic. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
United States The House of Representatives have passed the Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, a bill which has been characterised as having the power to ban TikTok. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
Professor Kate Sang has received £15,000 after the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Michelle Donelan, wrongly accused her of supporting Hamas. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
United States Former President Donald Trump has been ordered to pay writer, E Jean Carroll, $83.3 million in her defamation claim against him. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
United States The trial to determine the damages owed to E Jean Carroll by Donald Trump began on 16 January 2024 in New York. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 1:31 pm
“If the United States may sue any State or state official who expresses a contested view of the Constitution, then law professors, state lawyers, and all government officials have cause for serious concern. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 2:45 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Penalty Kick Management Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am
In its landmark 1964 decision, the United States Supreme Court held that a public official must prove “actual malice” or reckless disregard of the truth to win a libel lawsuit, providing critical protections for free speech and freedom of the press. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
The third speaks to the alignment of the first two with the overarching political-normative structures of both the political unit that seeks to regulate, and superior domain into which it is embedded. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
Bush appointed her to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
On 28 November 2022, Collins Rice J handed down judgement in the case of Parsons v Garnett & Others [2022] EWHC 3017 (KB). [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
The first trial ended in a mistrial when jurors could not agree on whether he should be convicted of second-degree or first-degree murder.In advance of that trial, the prosecutors developed a strategy to get around the requirements of the United States Supreme Court’s 1986 Batson v Kentucky decision. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am
IPKat has produced a book review of Intellectual Property Protection for AI-Generated Creations: Europe, United States, Australia and Japan, by Ana Ramalho, Copyright Counsel at Google, and a Guest Lecturer at Leiden University. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Army of the indigenous tribes in the trans-Mississippi West, the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the labor injunction, Plessy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
12 May 2022, 8:00 am
Amanda Parsons (Academic Fellow, Columbia; moving to Colorado), Cryptocurrency, Legibility, and Taxation: In Jarrett v. [read post]
