Search for: "United States v. Patrick"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
Justin Riemer is Chief Counsel of the Republican National Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state in Rucho v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
In Rucho v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
(relisted after the June 20 conference) Patrick v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant in U.S. illegally for violating a federal gun-possession law, prosecutors must show that defendant knew he was in the country illegally. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:31 am
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Ableman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:11 am
Sarah Grant dissected the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Karnoski v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:35 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
13 May 2019, 3:15 pm
State v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 8:25 am
Facts: This case (Mason v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 7:20 am
Indie Game Studios, LLC v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 5:33 pm
The case, Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm
I include those who are unemployed because, in most cases, unemployed people are now commonly assumed to be (paid) ‘job-seekers’ and may have certain social welfare entitlements which provide them with the most basic means for survival.[2] These distinctions may seem sharp and clear-cut as stated here. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm
Scott Johnson and his lawyers are among the most prolific serial filers in the United States, but the Ninth Circuit has eliminated any meaningful standing requirement in ADA cases, so the only real defense is compliance with the law. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:40 am
Dohme v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 9:44 pm
I guess I’ve been lucky because I have never had to do a trial or hearing where the opposing party acted in person, “pro se”, as they call it in the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
Circuit’s decision in McKeever v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 1:30 pm
The Court is the highest tribunal in the Nation for all cases and controversies arising under the Constitution or the laws of the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
