Search for: "United States v. Patrick" Results 301 - 320 of 1,267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am by Lisa Rodgers
The Implications and Consequences of United Kingdom Exit from the EU by Patrick J Birkinshaw, Andrea Biondi € The post Can whistleblowing claims be brought directly against co-workers, where all parties worked abroad for an international organisation? [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Vishnu Kannan
Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:17 am by Hadley Baker, Vishnu Kannan
ICYMI: Last Weekend on Lawfare Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am by Justin Riemer
Justin Riemer is Chief Counsel of the Republican National Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state in Rucho v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
He cites “a justice who served as an Arizona state legislator” and quotes from Sandra Day O’Connor’s opinion in Davis v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 20 conference)   Patrick v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
United States, the court held 7-2 that to convict a defendant in U.S. illegally for violating a federal gun-possession law, prosecutors must show that defendant knew he was in the country illegally. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:31 am by Steve Lubet
The Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Ableman v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:11 am by Vishnu Kannan
Sarah Grant dissected the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Karnoski v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Merely stating the seemingly obvious--that the unit of analysis is “the case”--does not solve all problems. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:30 pm by Dáire McCormack-George
I include those who are unemployed because, in most cases, unemployed people are now commonly assumed to be (paid) ‘job-seekers’ and may have certain social welfare entitlements which provide them with the most basic means for survival.[2] These distinctions may seem sharp and clear-cut as stated here. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm by Richard Hunt
 Scott Johnson and his lawyers are among the most prolific serial filers in the United States, but the Ninth Circuit has eliminated any meaningful standing requirement in ADA cases, so the only real defense is compliance with the law. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 9:44 pm by Georgialee Lang
I guess I’ve been lucky because I have never had to do a trial or hearing where the opposing party acted in person, “pro se”, as they call it in the United States. [read post]