Search for: "United States v. Patrick" Results 441 - 460 of 1,103
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
In the Kentucky Law Journal, law student Jordan Shewmaker looks at Honeycutt v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am by Christine Corcos
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:33 am
United States, 524 U.S. 125 (1998), which presented the question whether driving a car or truck with a firearm in the trunk or glove compartment amounted to “carrying” the firearm. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm by John Elwood
United States, 16-5454. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Wednesday’s argument in Endrew F. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the career-offender sentencing guideline is unconstitutionally vague, and Jennings v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
At Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage, Nicole Schneider discusses State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 8:24 am by Smita Ghosh
”)  Finally, Brenda Wineapple covers Steven Hahn’s A Nation Without Borders: The United States and Its World in an Age of Civil Wars, 1830-1910, the “most sweeping indictment to date of the American appetite for conquest. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 7:36 am
The court begins by explaining thatRichard Patrick Evensen pleaded guilty to various sex crimes after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Toomey argued that the district court had misunderstood several important technical aspects of Upstream surveillance and, as a result, had underestimated the scope and scale of the United States government’s searches of private internet communications. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether the residual clause of the sentencing guidelines is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 10:47 am by Andrew Hamm
G.G., immigration regulation in United States v. [read post]