Search for: "United States v. Paul" Results 281 - 300 of 4,373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2012, 8:14 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm by DMLP Staff
Medinger Source of Law: United StatesLegal Claims: OtherCourt Name: United States District Court for the District of MarylandLegal Counsel: Ezra Gollogly; Paul A. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas “finds the United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:48 am by Terry Lenamon
  As a revered member of the United States Supreme Court, Justice Stevens will be remembered in American History for many things, not the least of which is his 2008 concurring opinion in Baze v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:03 pm
The appeal, by the Federal Communications Commission and the United States, is now docketed as FCC, et al., v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 4:24 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Thanks to Dew Process for calling our attention to this quotation from Paul Rolf Jensen in the wake of Judge Lind’s ruling denying discovery in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 7:19 am
Clinton, Assessing the Variation of Formal Military Alliances Seung-Whan Choi & Patrick James, Why Does the United States Intervene Abroad? [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
But he now resided in Ecuador and could not, according to Sanchez’s lawyer, obtain a visa to enter the United States to testify on his nephew’s behalf. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:02 am
The precise contours of the personal benefit requirement have been subject to debate and uncertainty following the Second Circuit’s landmark decision in 2014 in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:24 am by Cormac Early
Coverage yesterday focused on the speech by retired Justice John Paul Stevens at the University of Arkansas in Little Rock, in which he criticized the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am by SHG
Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 671 (1983), the Supreme Court of the United States stated that the due process and equal protection principles of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibit ‘‘punishing a person for his poverty. [read post]