Search for: "United States v. Paul" Results 61 - 80 of 3,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2025, 8:43 am by Amy Howe
United States, a New York man’s challenge to his robbery convictions and sentences under two federal laws. [read post]
20 Mar 2025, 8:43 am
United States, a New York man’s challenge to his robbery convictions and sentences under two federal laws. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 5:01 am by Beatrice Yahia
Frank Thorp V, Sahil Kapur, and Ryan Nobles report for NBC News. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 8:52 pm by Josh Blackman
McConnell is concerned about the volume of the documents that Judge Kavanaugh has created in his 12 years on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, as well as in his roles as White House staff secretary under President George W. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 3:02 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Bridgen v Hancock,  12 March 2024 (Collins Rice J) Secretary of State for Education v Marples, 4 November 2024, (Sir Peter Lane) Colette Allen is the host of Newscast on Dr Thomas Bennett and Professor Paul Wragg’s The Media Law Podcast (@MediaLawPodcast). [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
[1] Unfortunately, under what I will call the Maximization Model of fiduciary duty in the United States and many other jurisdictions, the answer is that there really is a fiduciary duty to destroy the climate when doing so will maximize profits for firms and investors. [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 7:59 am by David Post
President Trump is refocusing government operations to their core mission—serving the citizens of the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2025, 10:32 am by Liz Dye
Hawaii, 585 U.S. 667, 713 (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring); see Department of State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2025, 6:07 am by Austen Parrish
The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment states that “[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States…. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 3:15 am by David Pocklington
In this judgment Petchey Ch stated that he need not go into the arguments arising [emphasis in original]. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 2:15 pm by Paul Cassell
[That's the powerful argument that Mayor Adams's lawyers are making, citing (among other grounds) the leaking of a resignation letter containing "the wildly inflammatory and false accusation that Mayor Adams and his counsel had, in essence, offered a quid to the Department of Justice in exchange for the quo of dismissal. [read post]