Search for: "United States v. Paul" Results 81 - 100 of 4,459
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2009, 4:02 am
EEO/iNews from the United States Courts of AppealiNews Related to Equal Employment OpportunitySource: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:41 am by David Lat
Smith, Paul Smith, Prop 8, Proposition 8, SCOTUS, Stephen Reinhardt, Supreme Court, Ted Olson, United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:09 am by Ezra Rosser
The University of Chicago Law Review has published articles from the “Understanding Education in the United States: Its Legal and Social Implications Symposium. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:58 pm by Patent Docs
Sanofi, all three advocates (Jeff Lamken for Amgen, Paul Clement for Sanofi, and Colleen Sindzak for the United States) had reason to reference and discuss an amicus brief submitted on behalf of Nobel Prize-winning scientist Sir Gregory Winter and colleagues,* on the scientific questions raised in the case with regard to what is sufficient to satisfy the enablement requirement of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:44 pm by Amy Howe
United States, the federal government’s challenge to Arizona’s aggressive efforts to reduce the number of illegal immigrants in that state. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:05 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States today issued two decisions in argued cases: The Court today issued decisions in the following two cases -- 1. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Federal Judge Robert Pitman set the table for the criminal trial of the United States vs. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 11:05 am
The Brown decision is considered by many to be one of the most important and influential decisions in the history of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 1:55 pm by John Floyd
The Supreme Court effectively redefined the concept in 1922 in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:01 pm
At 10 a.m, the Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:07 am by Christopher Mathews
The prosecution presented excerpts from LTC Lakin’s Care inquiry in which he admitted under oath that his former attorney, Paul Jensen, expressly told the accused that the orders he’d received were lawful, and that as an attorney, Mr. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:20 pm
I will miss not only Paul's superb advocacy on behalf of the United States, but also his wise counsel and keen legal analysis. [read post]