Search for: "United States v. Payne"
Results 41 - 60
of 180
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2023, 5:05 am
Circuit’s decision in Payne Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:46 pm
United States, a contracting officer is obligated to “put his own mind to the problems and render his own decisions. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:44 am
United States, demonstrated that “the administration’s hard line on the standard for criminalization has gone so far as to alarm several members of the Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 7:11 am
Carter v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am
Yesterday, the court heard arguments in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:32 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 12:13 pm
The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit had to grapple with the question of "whether the compelled use of Payne's thumb to unlock his phone was testimonial," the ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 8:35 am
From Judge Robert Payne's opinion Friday in Sroufe v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 7:33 am
Payne and Craig A. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 12:17 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 12:17 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
Helmerich & Payne points to the Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in Bell v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 12:03 pm
Payne v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 8:00 pm
The defense relief upon Payne v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 7:31 am
’ United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 pm
The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit had to grapple with the question of “whether the compelled use of Payne’s thumb to unlock his phone was testimonial,” the ruling in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am
Monday’s argument agenda also included State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:28 pm
United States provides hope to contractors that incur higher than anticipated costs on a requirements contract or, alternatively, on construction contracts where line item prices are based on estimated quantities. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 12:59 pm
Payne, 341 F.3d 393, 399 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
