Search for: "United States v. Payne" Results 81 - 100 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Coleman Saunders
” The brief of the United States, arguing in support of petitioners, criticized the decisions of the circuit court and outlined the position of the United States regarding the expropriation exception. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
” There was no deadline in the warrant for completion of the forensic examination and analysis, “nor [does] the Fourth Amendment provide[] for a specific time limit in which a computer may undergo a government forensic examination after it has been seized pursuant to a search warrant” (United States v Hernandez, 183 F Supp 2d 468, 480; see United States v Syphers, 426 F3d 461, 469, cert denied 547 U.S. 1158, 126 S. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:06 am by Jim Gerl
Image via WikipediaThe United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a decision in the case of Payne v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
P. 8(a)(2) and stating, `[n]either this court nor the district court is required to create Payne's claim for her’); cf. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm by Emily Coward
Batson challenges to strikes related to Black Lives Matter support Decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1986, Batson v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Revisiting precedent is particularly appropriate where, as here, a departure would not upset settled expectations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
The Senate Committee report highlights the hypocrisy of some critics of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in, Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:30 am by Michael Payne
United States, the United States Court of Federal Claims decided a bid protest in favor of Weeks Marine. [read post]
3 May 2017, 4:51 am by Edith Roberts
United States, Town of Chester v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
As its name suggests, the expropriation exception supplies federal courts with jurisdiction over certain cases concerning property taken by a foreign government: A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case . . . in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue and that property or any property exchanged for such property is present in the United… [read post]