Search for: "United States v. Payne"
Results 161 - 180
of 181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2009, 7:33 am
Payne and Craig A. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 6:16 pm
See Payne v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Revisiting precedent is particularly appropriate where, as here, a departure would not upset settled expectations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Payne, No. 07-5592 In a conviction for multiple counts involving drugs, firearms, violence and multiple murders, court order authorizing involuntary medication treatment plan designed to restore defendant's competency to stand trial is affirmed over claims of error that the district court erred in finding that the evidence offered at the hearing was sufficient to establish that the proposed treatment is substantially likely to restore defendant's competency. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Payne T. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
[xiii] The federal civil rights statute is Section 1983 within Title 42 of the United States Code. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 10:53 am
In a recent prebid protest presented by our firm, Payne Hackenbracht & Sullivan, the United States Court of Federal Claims considered the protest of Weeks Marine, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:32 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 3:15 pm
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971). [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 9:43 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 6:36 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 3:55 pm
" The instant case resembles the circumstances of United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 6:26 am
United States, 440 U.S. 48 (1979), that state law determines rights and obligations when the Code does not supply a federal rule. [read post]
10 May 2007, 5:31 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 8:00 pm
The defense relief upon Payne v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:51 am
The trial court had relied upon Payne v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
It is very rarely permitted, since the American system of justice is premised upon an open system in which, whenever one side wants to communicate with the Court, it has to give prior notice to the other side, so that they too will have an opportunity to be heard.).The "ex parte" order would give the RIAA permission to take "immediate discovery" -- before the defendants have been served or given notice -- which authorizes the issuance of subpoenas to the ISP's asking for the… [read post]
