Search for: "United States v. Pennsylvania R. Co."
Results 321 - 340
of 482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
Janice R. (14 NY3d 576 [2010], cert denied 562 U.S. 1136 [2011]), its earlier precedents, thereby greatly expanding the definition of who can obtain status as a parent and have standing to seek custody and visitation of a child. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:49 am
ITC (ITC 337 Update) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Stay pending reissue: Timing and blog reliability: Tyco Fire Products v Victaulic (Patently-O) District Court E D Texas: Defense win on fringement & invalidity in Judge Davis’ court: Alcatel-Lucent v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 8:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:46 pm
Guhan Subramanian has posted an interesting study of the Delaware takeover statute (§ 203), in which he and his co-authors find that “no bidder in the past nineteen years has been able to achieve 85% in a hostile tender offer against a Delaware target. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Duke and State of New York v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm
States, including Pennsylvania, had begun successfully passing restrictive abortion laws that were deliberately in tension, if not outright inconsistent, with, Roe. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm
In the 1970s, identification of the virus, and development of serologic tests helped differentiate hepatitis A from other types of non-B hepatitis.[5] Until 2004, HAV was the most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Moderator: IntLawGrrl guest/alumna Laurel Terry (Pennsylvania State) (right). 2:15-4 p.m. ? [read post]
1 May 2020, 7:14 am
As set forth in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s 1994 ruling in Gibbs v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:53 am
It didn't take long for the campaign to come to the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
In this case the United States Supreme Court held that a state attorney general action (really brought by contingent fee counsel proceeding in an AG’s name), ostensibly on behalf of all the citizens of a state, did not qualify as a “mass action” under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) so as to allow removal to federal court. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 am
Diamond Innovations Inc (EDTexweblog.com) (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania will revisit and reconsider the standing issue in false marking case: United States of America ex rel FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Schaefer v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
Another Year, Another Attempt in Congress to Ban Non-Competes Nationwide Senators Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) and Todd Young (R-Ind.) introduced legislation in 2019 entitled the Workforce Mobility Act (“WMA”). [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 11:22 am
& Gas Co., 111 F. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
Ambu A/S (Filewrapper) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Convenience of false marking plaintiff ‘in the business of litigation’ given little weight in venue dispute: United States of America, ex rel. et. al. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 5:45 am
Nelson (University of Houston), and Roberto Tallarita (Harvard Law School), on Wednesday, November 14, 2018 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm
Supreme Court Is Likely to Uphold State Powers in Some Way The pending South Dakota v. [read post]
