Search for: "United States v. Pennsylvania R. Co." Results 121 - 140 of 390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2024, 12:59 pm by Sarah Kane
The following article, written by student reporters, is part of a series of reflections from the Climate Constitutionalism Conference, hosted by Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University and Widener University Delaware Law School, and co-chaired by Distinguished Professor Katy Kuh (Haub Law) and Distinguished Professor James R. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
., 1943-Boulder, CO : Westview Press, c2011.AfricaKQC90 .M88 2010The golden book : philosophy of law for Africa creating the National State of Africa under God : the key is the number seven. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 4:04 pm
Posted by Philip Miles, an employment lawyer with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
At the Mississippi Business Journal, Ben Williams maintains that “[r]egardless of what Congress and the States do with sports gaming” after the court’s ruling in Murphy v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
And Perry also supported Texas’s fatally flawed lawsuit against Pennsylvania, his own home state, and three other states. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:25 pm
Posted by Philip Miles, an employment lawyer with McQuaide Blasko in State College, Pennsylvania. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The hope was that a newly composed Supreme Court would simply overturn the ruling—and return the issue of abortion to the states, which had shown increasingly conservative tendencies on the issue.A challenge to the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act led to the Supreme Court’s 1992 ruling in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]