Search for: "United States v. Perkins" Results 61 - 80 of 155
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
Perkins promptly called Agent Moore in Kansas, who was then advised by the Assistant United States Attorney handling the case to refrain from searching the computer and hard drive until consent or an additional warrant could be obtained. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Frank Perkins Hixon, Jr.Case number: 14-cv-00158 (United States District Court for the Western District of Texas)Case filed: February 20, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 20, 2015 5/29/2015 8/27/2015 2015-46 In the Matter of Larry C. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm by Stephen Bilkis
(People v Perkins, 62 AD3d 1160, 1161 [3d Dept] [affirming defendant's conviction for Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Second and Third Degrees; "Penal Law article 265 does not effect a complete ban on handguns and is, therefore, not a severe restriction' improperly infringing upon defendant's Second Amendment rights. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Rowland Perkins, II, Martin Bert Carter, Mark Crosby Nevdahl, and Ryan Allan RauchCase Number: 11-cv-01962 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case Filed: December 21, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 10, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-3 SEC vs. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
As of 2013, according to the UCLA’s Williams Institute, there were about 130,000 same-sex marriages in nineteen states across the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
(Baumancites and quotation marks omitted).The only exception to Bauman’s state of incorporation/principal place of business rule is for “exceptional” situations similar to Perkins v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:37 pm by Kevin Jon Heller
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
People v Perkins ruled that PL §§ 265.01(1) and 400.00 are constitutional and do not run afoul of Heller. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The motion judge, Perkins J., found that the Real Property Limitations Act applied. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
The move comes almost three years after the Justice Department said it wouldn’t defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in court and about seven months after the Supreme Court said a key part of DOMAwas unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment, in the United States v. [read post]