Search for: "United States v. Perkins" Results 81 - 100 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2009, 3:29 pm by Mary Whisner
The presentation will include a review of the federal court litigation filed in Seattle that eventually led to the United States Supreme Court 2006 landmark Hamdan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 5:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Frank Perkins Hixon, Jr.Case number: 14-cv-00158 (United States District Court for the Western District of Texas)Case filed: February 20, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 20, 2015 5/29/2015 8/27/2015 2015-46 In the Matter of Larry C. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 10:11 am by Greg Mersol
Posted by Greg MersolAnother California case has compelled the arbitration of a wage and hour claim in the wake of the United States Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:23 pm
(Baumancites and quotation marks omitted).The only exception to Bauman’s state of incorporation/principal place of business rule is for “exceptional” situations similar to Perkins v. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Rowland Perkins, II, Martin Bert Carter, Mark Crosby Nevdahl, and Ryan Allan RauchCase Number: 11-cv-01962 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case Filed: December 21, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: December 10, 2014 1/27/2015 4/27/2015 2015-3 SEC vs. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:19 am
Lovin, (SMU, Perkins School of Theology), Elizabeth B. [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 1:31 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States Patent & Trademark Office, 882 F.2d 1570 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 6:59 am by Allan Erbsen
For example, suppose that Wal-Mart decides to outsource all manufacturing of its store-branded products to a subsidiary in, say, Turkey, which then ships millions of units to every state.  [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 11:57 am
Perkins, 18 Ohio St.3d 193, 196, 480 N.E.2d 763 (1985), citing Nix v. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
The move comes almost three years after the Justice Department said it wouldn’t defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in court and about seven months after the Supreme Court said a key part of DOMAwas unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment, in the United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
The motion judge, Perkins J., found that the Real Property Limitations Act applied. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
People v Perkins ruled that PL §§ 265.01(1) and 400.00 are constitutional and do not run afoul of Heller. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am by Robert Manchel
The federal courthouses are also considered united states courthouses. [read post]