Search for: "United States v. Perry"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,025
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2009, 11:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
In Perry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 4:56 am
The United States switched sides to advocate that the statute be ruled unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 5:56 pm
United States, see my article on The Gold Clause Cases.) [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 5:53 pm
I can’t help concluding this post with a brief observation on the similarity between Arizonans United and Perry. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:37 am
Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, and United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
United States argument 3/1/2010 Kiyemba v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am
The Supreme Court is not likely to impose same-sex marriage on the entire country, so Perry v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 12:17 am
Then, in Perry v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 4:30 am
Franc Perry illustrates how a claim of fraudulent concealment affects a statute of limitations defense. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 3:03 pm
Perry v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
In Perry, et al, v The City of New York, et al, Docket No. 21-2095, decided August 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, said:"In this collective action, a group of 2,519 EMTs and paramedics allege that their employer, the City of New York, willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring them to perform work before and after their shifts without paying them for that work unless the plaintiffs specifically… [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:05 am
Farnan v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
In Perry, et al, v The City of New York, et al, Docket No. 21-2095, decided August 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, said:"In this collective action, a group of 2,519 EMTs and paramedics allege that their employer, the City of New York, willfully violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by requiring them to perform work before and after their shifts without paying them for that work unless the plaintiffs specifically… [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 3:57 am
Perry, a case about whether the Ten Commandments could be placed in a public park outside the state capital in Texas. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:39 am
Oct. 11, 2022); and United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 12:15 pm
In the United States, that is not true. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am
The order’s focus faces outward towards the alien residents of the subject countries, not inward towards persons in the United States like the plaintiffs . . . . [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
The Impact of Windsor These recent rulings are fueled by the Supreme Court’s ruling last June in United States v. [read post]