Search for: "United States v. Perry" Results 121 - 140 of 1,125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2009, 3:43 am
" They cite to a "famous footnote in a 1938 Supreme Court case" - footnote four of United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 5:40 am by Timothy P. Flynn
A proactive clerk in Dona Ana County, New Mexico began issuing same-sex marriage licenses last August in the wake of the SCOTUS' same-sex marriage decision in United States v Windsor. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:35 am by Orin Kerr
”; “marriage is widely regarded as the definitive expression of love and commitment in the United States. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
On that same date, the United States Supreme Court issued the landmark Windsor v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:22 am by Ben
The song sold 13.2 million units (combined sales and track-equivalent streams), becoming the second best-selling song worldwide in 2014.Was there copying? [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 10:37 pm
The song sold 13.2 million units (combined sales and track-equivalent streams), becoming the second best-selling song worldwide in 2014.Was there copying? [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 They are: Griggsville-Perry Community Unit School District No. 4 v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 4:26 pm
  My personal view is that (1) Article III standing should exist, but (2) under United States Supreme Court precedent, it probably doesn't. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 2:46 pm
Perry and the Board of Pardons will enhance the reputation of Texas and the United States throughout the world. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm by Fiona de Londras
Next Steps in the United States There is little doubt that, at some point, Perry v Schwarzenegger will end up in front of the US Supreme Court for a final analysis. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:00 pm by Record on Appeal
Today, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals released its opinion (by Circuit Judge Reinhardt) in Perry v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am by Cormac Early
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]