Search for: "United States v. Peters" Results 1 - 20 of 1,928
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Immigration Prof
United States, which enjoined the Obama administration's expanded deferred action program. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:17 am by immigrationprof
PENNumbra, the University of Pennsylvania Law Review's online publication, has a discussion between Professors Peter Spiro (Temple) and Kit Johnson (Oklahoma) on "Immigration Preemption after United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:16 am by Richard Samp - Guest
SCOTUSblog deserves considerable thanks for putting together this symposium about United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 12:04 pm
United States": C-SPAN has posted the video of this Monday's broadcast, featuring Peter Irons and Karen Korematsu, at this link. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 8:48 am by Immigration Prof
The ruling delays implementation of President Trump’s proclamation barring otherwise qualified visa applicants from entry into the United States unless they are... [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 8:38 pm by Howard Bashman
United States Could Signal a Major Change in the Supreme Court’s Separation of Powers Jurisprudence”: Peter J. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Kali Borkoski
United States ,” which will lead you to all the posts. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:47 am by DMLP Staff
§ 875(c); conspiracy to make publically available restricted personal information of an employee of the United States under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 6:55 am by Steve Vladeck
 United States, which raises the question whether military commissions may constitutionally try offenses that are not recognized as international war crimes. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by Benjamin Wittes
This measure is a vital complement to the United States material support statute, upheld by the Supreme Court in Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm by Michael Knapp
United States, or its decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
[This is the twelfth in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]
6 May 2014, 12:00 pm by Steve Vladeck
It’s clear from his post this morning that my friend Peter Margulies believes that Al-Nashiri’s new habeas challenge to his trial by military commission, which rests on the claim that the United States was not involved in an armed conflict with al Qaeda at the time of his alleged crimes, is without merit. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]