Search for: "United States v. Peters" Results 261 - 280 of 2,647
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2007, 1:54 am
 In the lawsuit, today was the day set by federal Judge Peter Beer requesting the United States Attorney's Office to intervene in the lawsuit, or face a July 11 show cause hearing explaining why not. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 3:52 am by Thomas Long
Case date: 14 February 2019 Case number: No. 17-2510 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:51 pm by Peter Spiro
A foreign entity may even have military or economic interests adverse to the United States. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:28 pm by LTA-Editor
By Peter Montine The United States Supreme Court has made it easier for district courts to award attorney’s fees in frivolous patent infringement cases. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:11 am by Ben
He is teaching both in Hungarian and English language at the Szeged Law School, and he has delivered lectures at universities in Finland, the United States, France, Germany and Russia, and presented papers on conferences in Hungary, Germany, Canada, United States, Austria, Finland, Indonesia and France. [read post]
10 May 2007, 2:29 pm
In the Federal Tort Claims Act, Congress waived the sovereign immunity of the United States (and thus created the possibility of damages) for the "negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court also released an opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:22 pm
Ben Golant, the Copyright Office’s assistant general counsel, asked whether AT&T, the exclusive provider for the iPhone in the United States, “prohibits you from implementing certain applications? [read post]
9 Mar 2024, 1:30 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
  The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, in Heller v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 4:53 pm by admin
As we previously reported on our blog, on June 17, the United States Supreme Court, in New Process Steel v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 3:08 pm
  The public has a presumptive right of access to these proceedings, and where, as in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 6:09 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) A few weeks ago, at the Privacy Law Scholars Conference in Washington, DC, a group of privacy activists put on a panel about how to implement the mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment from the two concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:04 pm by Bill Ward
At the heart of this case is a question similar to those that are under consideration by the United States Supreme Court in the Florida case, Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 1:10 pm
The issue was whether the search of Seymour's vehicle violated his rights guaranteed by article 1, § 4 of the Wyoming Constitution or the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.Under both the United States and the Wyoming Constitutions, the Court examines the totality of the circumstances to determine whether the consent was voluntary. [read post]