Search for: "United States v. Peters" Results 61 - 80 of 2,658
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Ford, President of the United States of America, proclaim and make public the Treaty, Protocol of Signature, and the exchange of notes, to the end that they shall be observed and fulfilled with good faith on and after January 21, 1977, by the United States of America and by the citizens of the United States of America and all other persons subject to the jurisdiction thereof. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 4:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
Peter Margulies of Roger Williams School of Law writes in with the following comments on yesterday’s Clapper decision: The Supreme Court’s decision Tuesday in Clapper v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm by Mary Minow
Peter Hirtle, Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center Advisory Board It is very difficult to determine whether works are in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 3:02 pm by Mary Minow
Peter Hirtle, Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center Advisory Board It is very difficult to determine whether works are in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:54 am by Shawn Nevers
  He focused on his recent occasion of arguing before the United States Supreme Court, an opporunity few Utah attorneys have had. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 4:10 am
Peter discusses the Court's opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:19 am by Mike Hanzel
LTC Kageleiry asked the Court to apply the “Toth Doctrine” (United States ex rel. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 1:19 pm by constitutional lawblogger
In a 23 page opinion and order today, United States District Judge Peter Economus issued a preliminary injunction in Obama for America v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Benjamin Wittes
European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Benjamin Wittes
 European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 3:05 am
[This is the second in a series of posts by CrimProf's graduate fellow, Peter Stockburger (University of San Diego Class of 2009), previewing the criminal law and procedure cases scheduled for argument in the U.S. [read post]