Search for: "United States v. Peterson" Results 1 - 20 of 314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm by NARF
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974)United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Peterson, Daggers & Fighting Knives of the Western World 60 (1968). [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The lawsuit charges he “is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am by Laurence H. Tribe
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 8:47 am by Ingrid Wuerth
Instead, they were protesting judicial decisions that ordered the assets paid to judgment creditors in terrorism cases, in particular the Supreme Court’s decision in Peterson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm by Jeff Welty
Branen, 17 F.3d 552, 557 (2d Cir. 1994) (stating broadly that “[i]t is widely recognized that all law enforcement officials have an affirmative duty to intervene to protect the constitutional rights of citizens from infringement by other law enforcement officers in their presence,” including when “any constitutional violation has been committed by a law enforcement official”); Peterson v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" This basic principle, namely that the requirement of probable cause to permit entry into a private home is not excused based upon any relative perceived societal importance, was further articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Mincey v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]