Search for: "United States v. Pierce" Results 181 - 200 of 649
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2008, 10:03 am
The Court has already held that states have positive obligations to protect children from sexual abuse and corporal punishment from their parents (Z v United Kingdom (2002) and A v United Kingdom (1998), for example) and so the integrity of this public/private dividing line is not in issue, but whether it will be pierced from a gender perspective remains to be seen. [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:47 pm by John C. Manoog III
The Appellate Court’s Decision The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the suit. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Howard Friedman
United States, 41 Journal of Supreme Court History 21-38 (2016).Symposium on LGBT Antidiscrimination Law and Policy After Hobby Lobby. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:50 am by Julian Ku
  Imagine a court in the United States attempting to apply norms of U.S. law to pierce the corporate veil of a business incorporated under the law of a foreign country. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:42 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Clinton was the 2016 Democratic Party nominee for President of the United States, United States Secretary of State from 2009 until 2013, a United States Senator for the State of New York from 2001 to 2009, and the First Lady of the United States from 1993 to 2001. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:38 pm by Steve Bainbridge
  Also, because this is a case of first impression in the United States under this type of wording of the statute, it may be precedential to other jurisdictions with similar wording. [read post]