Search for: "United States v. Pierce"
Results 261 - 280
of 644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2014, 10:39 am
RobbinsCase number: 13-cv-06694 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: September 23, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 27, 2013 01/17/2014 04/17/2014 2013-125 SEC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 12:37 am
United States U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 12:30 pm
— United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 1:24 pm
By Lauren Lynch Flick and Amy Pierce This past Friday, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit released its long-awaited decision in ACA International et al. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 11:36 am
United States, 509 U.S. 544 (1993). [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
” As I explained in an earlier post, Congress intended RFRA to incorporate by reference the Supreme Court’s Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence from the era preceding Employment Division v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:31 am
United States, 295 U.S. 78 (1935). [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 11:02 am
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees certain freedoms, including the “freedom of speech”. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 12:11 pm
As an aside, United States v. 4.0 Acres of Land was an Arizona case, where the U.S. government condemned land to build a federal courthouse. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:00 am
In a unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court held that in order for a public official to prevail in such a suit, it was not enough to show that the statement in question contained some inaccuracies. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:02 pm
Mukasey, No. 06-2477 "In order to establish eligibility for relief based exclusively on activities undertaken after his arrival in the United States, an alien must make some showing that authorities in his country of nationality are: 1) aware of his activities; or 2) likely to become aware of his activities. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:35 pm
” Francisco argued that a “good cause” limit on the power to remove officers of the United States conflicts with the power the U.S. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 1:01 pm
United States, the Supreme Court is reconsidering the scope of the 1980s Armed Career Criminal Act which adds a 15-year prison term on armed career criminals. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:16 am
Scott Pierce Requirement under subsection 102(f) of Title 35 of the United States Code that a person “himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented” has been removed by the Leahy-Smith American Invents Act (AIA) of 2011. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Boren (1976) United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:55 am
Such a discharge violates a clear mandate of public policy and therefore is unlawful Pierce v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:26 pm
On its own motion, the Court stayed further briefing in this matter pending action by the United States Supreme Court in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
In Runyon v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:01 pm
Vermillion and the City appeal, arguing that the superior court erred because article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution and the First and Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution protect the requested documents.West v. [read post]
