Search for: "United States v. Pierce" Results 341 - 360 of 614
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2013, 1:23 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm by Dennis Crouch
Personal Liability for Patent Infringement: A plain reading of the patent laws make clear that individuals can be held liable for patent infringement. 35 U.S.C. 271(a) ("whoever without authority makes … any patented invention, within the United States … infringes the patent"). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 6:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Judge Barbara Crabb of the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin issued an order denying the plaintiffs’ motion for class and collective action certification of unpaid meal period claims in Boelk, et al. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Sackett v. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Last Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari to review the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in McReynolds v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 5:12 am by Nicole Kellner-Swick
He can be reached at 216.685.1062 and ________________________________________ [1] Belvedere Condominium Unit Owners’ Assoc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:26 pm by Brad Pauley
  On its own motion, the Court stayed further briefing in this matter pending action by the United States Supreme Court in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 12:04 pm by David Bernstein
Nebraska and Pierce v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:56 pm
In the United States, they are governed by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 10:14 am by Michelle Yeary
   If the point was to distinguish Cabana from McGuan by saying that plaintiff Cabana is bringing a claim for violation of a federal regulation, not a state law tort claim -- well, we direct your attention back to square one:  the United States, not private litigants, enforces the FDCA and FDA regulations. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:16 am
Scott Pierce Requirement under subsection 102(f) of Title 35 of the United States Code that a person “himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented” has been removed by the Leahy-Smith American Invents Act (AIA) of 2011. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 7:55 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  Likewise, she rejected many other rulings from throughout the United States that have accepted the EEOC’s contention. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:25 am
Filed August 16, 2012) (click here for .pdf of Complaint) Debtor Raving Brands, Inc. was the subject of an involuntary case under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the United States Code on April 1, 2009. [read post]