Search for: "United States v. Pierce" Results 141 - 160 of 617
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
District Court for the State of Maine issued an order granting a  motion to suppress evidence in United States of America v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 672 F.3d 482, 491-92 (7th Cir.2012), distinguishing Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 7:13 am by Kathy Darvil
Yesterday, the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, applying strict scrutiny, upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policies. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:44 am by Susan Brenner
Dingman, supra (quoting United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 2:31 am
In this connection, a recent judgment of the Court of Appeal in Secretary of State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:21 am by Adam Weinstein
On October 4, 2012, Anglin pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud before the United States District Court for the Central District of California in U.S. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 5:59 am by Amy Howe
” At Illinois Public Radio, Verity Winship weighs in on United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 10:14 am by Robby Sanoff
To paraphrase Shakespeare, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
     ‘Un Somaro Piumato’--Rethinking the Scope and Nature of State Liability for Acts of their Commercial Instrumentalities: State Owned Enterprises and State-Owner Liability in the Post-Global Larry Catá Backer[1]   Abstract: Under what circumstances might a state be subject to liability for the conduct of its state owned enterprises (SOEs)? [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
 at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).ConclusionThe judgment of the United States Court of Appeals forthe Federal Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.Highmark, Inc. at *5. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:18 am by Nabiha Syed
United States (consolidated with General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 5:10 pm
At a minimum, the opportunities for veil piercing--and reaching the commercial assets of the Russian federation abroad, might provide a tempting enough insurance policy of sorts for foreigners seeking to do business with Rosatom or its subsidiaries. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:27 am by Larry
See United States v. [read post]