Search for: "United States v. Pierce" Results 161 - 180 of 646
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2013, 10:14 am by Robby Sanoff
To paraphrase Shakespeare, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
     ‘Un Somaro Piumato’--Rethinking the Scope and Nature of State Liability for Acts of their Commercial Instrumentalities: State Owned Enterprises and State-Owner Liability in the Post-Global Larry Catá Backer[1]   Abstract: Under what circumstances might a state be subject to liability for the conduct of its state owned enterprises (SOEs)? [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
 at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).ConclusionThe judgment of the United States Court of Appeals forthe Federal Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.Highmark, Inc. at *5. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:18 am by Nabiha Syed
United States (consolidated with General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:27 am by Larry
See United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:05 am
Here's the abstract:This paper assesses the legal consequences of the framework established pursuant to Resolution 1267 (1999) and subsequent decisions by the United Nations Security Council imposing sanctions on individuals not necessarily associated with states or state actors. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:12 am
Issue: Whether the antifraud provisions of the United States securities laws extend to transnational frauds where: (a) the foreign-based parent company conducted substantial business in the United States and (b)the claims arose from an accounting fraud perpetrated by American citizens at the parent company's Florida based subsidiary, and whether subject matter jurisdiction extends to transnational fraud-on-the-market claims. [read post]
14 May 2022, 9:31 am by Mavrick Law Firm
  The plaintiff-employee may attempt to prove discrimination through circumstantial evidence by satisfying the United States Supreme Court’s burden-shifting framework set forth it its decision in McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:09 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Comm’r,489 F.3d 1018, 1023 (9th Cir. 2007); United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:56 am by OxFirst
Pierce, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:55 pm
  That legal challenge went all the way to the United States Supreme Court (the highest court in our country), which ruled in favor of Anna Nicole Smith in 2006. [read post]
In AMG, the Court rejected the FTC’s interpretation of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, which states that the commission “may bring suit in a district court of the United States to enjoin” violations of the law that the FTC enforces. [read post]