Search for: "United States v. Pierce"
Results 161 - 180
of 644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
‘Un Somaro Piumato’--Rethinking the Scope and Nature of State Liability for Acts of their Commercial Instrumentalities: State Owned Enterprises and State-Owner Liability in the Post-Global Larry Catá Backer[1] Abstract: Under what circumstances might a state be subject to liability for the conduct of its state owned enterprises (SOEs)? [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 8:38 am
at *4-5 (internal citations omitted).ConclusionThe judgment of the United States Court of Appeals forthe Federal Circuit is vacated, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.Highmark, Inc. at *5. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 6:18 am
United States (consolidated with General Dynamics Corp. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 6:34 pm
Pierce v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 6:00 am
In Allen v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:12 am
Pierce v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:05 am
Here's the abstract:This paper assesses the legal consequences of the framework established pursuant to Resolution 1267 (1999) and subsequent decisions by the United Nations Security Council imposing sanctions on individuals not necessarily associated with states or state actors. [read post]
27 May 2010, 8:48 am
., v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 2:32 am
In Lambert v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:12 am
Issue: Whether the antifraud provisions of the United States securities laws extend to transnational frauds where: (a) the foreign-based parent company conducted substantial business in the United States and (b)the claims arose from an accounting fraud perpetrated by American citizens at the parent company's Florida based subsidiary, and whether subject matter jurisdiction extends to transnational fraud-on-the-market claims. [read post]
14 May 2022, 9:31 am
The plaintiff-employee may attempt to prove discrimination through circumstantial evidence by satisfying the United States Supreme Court’s burden-shifting framework set forth it its decision in McDonnell Douglas v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 7:09 pm
Anschutz Corp. v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 1:09 pm
Comm’r,489 F.3d 1018, 1023 (9th Cir. 2007); United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 10:56 am
Pierce, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 7:55 pm
That legal challenge went all the way to the United States Supreme Court (the highest court in our country), which ruled in favor of Anna Nicole Smith in 2006. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
In AMG, the Court rejected the FTC’s interpretation of Section 13(b) of the FTC Act, which states that the commission “may bring suit in a district court of the United States to enjoin” violations of the law that the FTC enforces. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:48 am
In Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 10:14 am
After the Federal Circuit issued its opinion, Dow filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
