Search for: "United States v. Pinto"
Results 61 - 67
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am
Coming back to Propecia, the warning label in the United States didn’t mention until June of this year, but the warning labels in the United Kingdom have said for some time: In addition, the following have been reported in postmarketing use: persistence of erectile dysfunction after discontinuation of treatment with PROPECIA; male breast cancer (see 4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use) Propecia in Sweden and Italy has similar warnings. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
United States, 217 U.S. 349 (1910), a cruel and unusual punishment case. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am
Firstly, a judgment will be issued this Thursday on kettling (Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom; a brief history of the case can be found here) by the Grand Chamber of the ECHR. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
The Board modified the judge's recommended Order to conform to the violations found and its standard remedial language, and modified the unit description in the Order to reflect the unit description alleged in the complaint and admitted by the Respondent in its answer. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 4:29 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 10:03 pm
(See Grimshaw v. [read post]
