Search for: "United States v. Pitman" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Federal Judge Robert Pitman set the table for the criminal trial of the United States vs. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 10:04 am by Dan Flynn
” The federal criminal case of the United States v Paul Kruse went to the jury by midweek after evidence was closed and submitted to the jury. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
 A federal district court judge in Texas has set the starting trial date for the United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas “finds the United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:22 am by Dwight Sullivan
Pitman, No. 37453, is:  “Under the elements test established by United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 3:56 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Attorney Sharon Cohen Levin, asset forfeiture unit chief in the southern district of New York, describes the government's investigation in court papers filed in United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:47 pm by Dan Flynn
The United States v Paul Kruse trial in Austin, TX, has adjourned for the weekend. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:16 pm by David Greene
 In a victory for free speech rights, United States District Judge Edgardo Ramos in New York said the First Amendment protects the independent news organization Respublika from the government’s censorship tactics. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 5:58 pm by Matt Cooper
Texas: In Texas League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
AUSTIN — It was a long but primarily quiet Monday as a 12-man, four-woman jury was selected to hear the United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm by Jarod Bona
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm by Jarod Bona
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]