Search for: "United States v. Plate"
Results 41 - 60
of 889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2015, 2:21 pm
ALPR fixed positions similarly notify a central dispatch unit when a hit is detected.In addition to extracting the license plate number, the ALPR system records the date and location where it captured the plate’s image. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:04 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:20 am
In Cressman v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 3:26 pm
In the United States, there is a presumption of innocence and a Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 5:16 am
In Vasquez v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 12:01 pm
United States reversed the U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 1:08 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2016, 9:12 am
Drivers in states where marijuana is legal cannot be pulled over in other states by cops who make assumptions based on solely on the origin of the license plate. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 7:42 am
In each case, the warrantless placement of the GPS on the defendant’s vehicle occurred before the 2012 United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:27 pm
The court also concludes that Vermont’s program is unreasonable as applied to Byrne’s JN36TN plate:” Related posts:Why Wasn’t United States v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 1:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:33 am
See United Food & Commer. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
United States, 575 U.S. ___, 135 S. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 9:23 am
United States, 575 U.S. ___, 135 S. [read post]
9 May 2007, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:28 pm
With respect to the decision to issue a “Union Yes” plate, while the myriad issues pertaining to organized labor in the United States are social and political in nature, there is no basis to conclude that the Department failed to apply the policy against creating plates that touch upon contentious political issues as opposed to having applied the policy and merely reaching a different result than it did with the “Choose Life”… [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 7:07 am
State v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:11 am
[Post by Jake McGowan] United States v. [read post]
