Search for: "United States v. Pleasant" Results 121 - 140 of 216
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm by Danielle Citron
Twenty-four State Attorneys General signed an Amicus Brief in support of Arizona, as did the United States. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:23 pm by Anna Christensen
  Further, Lyle has provided our readers with his insightful commentary on other issues ranging from church-state separation (in both Pleasant Grove v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:59 am by Susan Brenner
The IP address used to open the second user account . . . was traced to Vitina Pleasant of Federal Way, Washington. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]
15 May 2015, 9:10 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Resource Investments v. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 12:00 am
(TTABlog) Monarch Casino & Resort - Trademark battle over the fame of ATLANTIS for casino services headed to trial in Nevada District Court: Kerzner International Inc v Monarch Casino & Resort Inc (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) Soccer United Marketing – SUM and Major League Soccer sue of Black & Decker over ‘ambush marketing’ (Trademark Blog)   [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 2:34 pm by Josh Blackman
United States – which is used "in service of the constitutional rule" that Congress cannot delegate legislative power to the executive branch. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am by Benjamin Wittes
Solutions are to be found in countries like the United States, Switzerland, India and Spain. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:31 pm
United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 623 (1984) ("Freedom of association ... plainly presupposes a freedom not to associate. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
District Court (also in Maryland, as it happens) threw out the indictment in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:51 pm by Florian Mueller
The Supreme Court of the United States is concerned with proper interpretation of what Congress decides, and not with making policy judgments for Congress.I'm not going to discuss the frequently-cited SAS Institute v. [read post]