Search for: "United States v. Pleasant" Results 141 - 160 of 214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm by Nissenbaum Law Group
  Overstock claimed the statute violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:02 am by Kashmir Hill
Cell phones are addictive, I suppose…The opinion cites United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 8:57 am by Dwight Sullivan
  One of the less-than-pleasant events during 2010 was the VWAP fiasco in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:00 am by GuestPost
Sometimes the image you see in that mirror is not a pleasant one. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 8:23 pm by Anna Christensen
  Further, Lyle has provided our readers with his insightful commentary on other issues ranging from church-state separation (in both Pleasant Grove v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:26 am by Goldberg Segalla LLP
  In April 2010, the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri denied the reinsurers’ motion. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 5:29 am
 Meanwhile the annual IP Publishers and Editors lunch on 7 December, also in London (click here and scroll down for details) has gone one better, with 44 participants signed up from as far afield as the United States and Germany. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am by Dave
In particular, the Court must examine whether the decision-making process leading to measures of interference was fair and such as to afford due respect to the interests safeguarded to the individual by Article 8 (see Buckley v. the United Kingdom, 25 September 1996, § 76, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27138/95, § 92, ECHR 2001-I; and Connors, cited above, §§ 83 and 92) 68. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 3:23 pm by Larry Catá Backer
  The focus has usually been on the standard list of big state actors--most recently the United States in Viet-Nam  and Afghanistan-Iraq,  and the Russians in Afghanistan and the like. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:23 am by jamison
  She is so pleasant, so unassuming, so convinced of her husband’s innocence that I want very much to believe her. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm by Brendan Kevenides
Nowhere else in the United States has a state high court declared that bicyclists are not the intended users of the very paved streets for which their two-wheeling forebearers advocated. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 11:47 am by Kedar
Heller – Agreed 25-Mar United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Steven Taber
Click here to read more Court Rules Against Long-Term Protection of Aircraft Tail Numbers. --- Mike Mitchell, AvStop.com, February 28, 2010 A United States District Court judge has ruled that a list of private aircraft, whose aircraft tail numbers are blocked from the public view, must be released under the Freedom of Information Act. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:27 pm by Ken
Now with the help of the CSI unit we can name the guilty critter. [read post]