Search for: "United States v. Poland"
Results 1 - 20
of 477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2012, 1:56 am
Pomiechowski v District Court of Legunica, Poland; Lukaszewski v District Court in Torun, Poland; Rozanski v Regional Court 3 Penal Department, Poland; Regina (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20; [2012] WLR (D) 158 “When a notice of appeal against an extradition decision had an irregularity which could be cured by amendment and the circumstances merited that, the court had jurisdiction to… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:57 am
Blount with the blog faculty The United States and Poland have signed a Protocol Amending the Ballistic Missile Defense Agreement Between the United States of America and the Republic of Poland: PROTOCOL AMENDING THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND CONCERNING THE DEPLOYMENT OF GROUND-BASED BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE INTERCEPTORS IN THE… [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 3:36 pm
The Supreme Court on March 3 issued a ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
The United States is its largest market. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:48 am
Finally, the Mother argued that the children had stronger ties to the United States than they did to Poland, and therefore should be permitted to remain. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm
(quoting Mozes v. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 7:06 pm
The Republic of Poland, the Kingdom of Denmark and the Italian Republic Friday filed declarations of intervention in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case of Ukraine v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:40 pm
In Mlynarski v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 9:36 am
Poland and Ahmed and Others v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 1:36 am
Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated “this draft legislation threatens media freedom and could undermine Poland’s strong investment climate”. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:50 am
Zalewska v Department for Social Development House of Lords “The United Kingdom's decision to restrict the payment of welfare benefits for nationals of Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, known collectively as the A8 states, to those who had worked an uninterrupted 12 months in employment registered with the Home Office was not incompatible with European Union law. [read post]
23 May 2016, 11:40 am
" Lozano v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:43 am
In Gwiazdowski v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:49 am
High Court (Family Division) R v R [2012] EWHC 2390 (Fam) (13 August 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Glowacki v Regional Court in Ostroleka Poland [2012] EWHC 2305 (Admin) (25 July 2012) Jones v Government of United States [2012] EWHC 2332 (Admin) (25 July 2012) Media Protection Services Ltd v Crawford & Anor [2012] EWHC 2373 (Admin) (16 August 2012) Krolik & Ors v Several Judicial Authorities of… [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:10 am
Under this state-by-state patchwork, the United States may develop an abortion regime that starts to look more like Europe’s. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 9:10 am
Under this state-by-state patchwork, the United States may develop an abortion regime that starts to look more like Europe’s. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 4:52 am
United States, 725 F.2d 1225, 1227-28 (9th Cir. 1984); United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 11:07 am
Poland’s Senate has rejected legislation that would enforce new media ownership rules, impacting Discovery Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
