Search for: "United States v. Pole"
Results 1 - 20
of 253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
On June 16, 2020, the First Circuit released its opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:24 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 8:24 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 3:05 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 1:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:18 am
Ecological Rights Foundation v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 8:01 am
United States. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 4:40 pm
It decides the fee is not "content based" and therefore the relatively lax standard of United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 1:23 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 12:00 am
United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm
Today the Sixth Circuit handed down a notable opinion squarely addressing the question, reserved in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:24 pm
Citing Anderson-Bagshaw and Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 1:52 pm
Citing to United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
United States applies. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 1:41 pm
Twitter brings news of this interesting little order in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
As of 2008, there were 36 million utility-owned wood poles in service across the United States that have been treated with PCP. [read post]
21 May 2010, 4:57 pm
KIUC is charged with nine counts each of taking threatened species in violation of 16 USC §§ 1538(a)(1)(G) and 1540(b)(1) and Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, § 17.31(c) and (a); and taking migratory birds in violation of 16 USC §§ 703(a), 707(a).I haven't had time to do more than scan it and I'm no expert at environmental law - especially endangered species (we'll learn about it together as the case progresses) - but I notice that many of the… [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 2:18 pm
This case, United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2018, 10:24 am
The complaint (full text) in Shurtleff v. [read post]
