Search for: "United States v. Pollack"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 3:05 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:49 pm
Pollack, The Road Not Taken: Comparative International Judicial Dissent International DecisionsGeir Ulfstein, Qatar v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 2:51 am
In July 2007, plaintiff appealed the Order of Dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit by notice filed by Pollack. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 7:58 am
Attorney’s Office Southern District of Florida on July 14, 2011 released the following: “INTERNATIONAL DRUG MONEY LAUNDERING INDICTMENT UNSEALED Wifredo Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida and John V. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 9:32 am
Glukhin V. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 2:04 pm
Pollack (Cultural Resources; National Historic Preservation Act; Tribal Consultation) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html J.P. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether the Federal Tort Claims Act allows a prison inmate to sue the government for an alleged sexual assault committed by guards at a federal prison. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:15 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:33 pm
McLafferty v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm
Oklahoma; Self Defense) United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am
The Complaint asserts six causes of action: (1) a violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution based on Defendants’ actions in denying Plaintiffs their rights to freely practice their religion; (2) a violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am
The Complaint asserts six causes of action: (1) a violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution based on Defendants’ actions in denying Plaintiffs their rights to freely practice their religion; (2) a violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:03 am
Alan Pollack (Windels Marx) is handing the appeal for Dr. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
Import: Section 337:Trademark:Registered mark, Common-law mark:Secondary meaning:Word mark: Product-packaging trade dress: Product-design trade dress:Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition:Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-936.Section 337 provides a remedy at the ITC for, among other things, “the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United… [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm
United States, 627 A.2d 968, 970 (D.C. 1993) (quoting United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 8:18 am
By Nicole Greenstein C’14Professors Lillian BeVier, Theodore Ruger and Arlen SpecterOn Monday, November 21, a crowd of students and faculty convened in Penn Law’s Gittis Hall for a debate on the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
