Search for: "United States v. Porche" Results 1 - 20 of 143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2012, 7:33 pm
Three and a half years later, the Sixth Circuit wrote about that night in United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 2:16 pm by Barry Barnett
., arguing to the jury in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:49 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, claimant was injured in 2001 while digging posts for a newly-constructed porch. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:49 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, a case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, claimant was injured in 2001 while digging posts for a newly-constructed porch. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 11:02 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
Friedman represents defendants with criminal charges in the New Jersey Superior Court in all New Jersey counties, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Newark, Trenton and Camden, all New Jersey municipal courts, and the state and federal criminal courts located in Manhattan and Brooklyn. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 11:02 am by James S. Friedman, LLC
Friedman represents defendants with criminal charges in the New Jersey Superior Court in all New Jersey counties, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Newark, Trenton and Camden, all New Jersey municipal courts, and the state and federal criminal courts located in Manhattan and Brooklyn. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 8:12 am
United States, the now-famous GPS case where a unanimous Court overturned years of practice by holding that placing a GPS monitor on the underside of a suspect's vehicle is a "search" that must be supported by a warrant. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
By Matthew Hinks The well-known "nexus" and "rough proportionality" tests from the United States Supreme Court's opinions in Nollan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:52 am by Daniel Cappetta
” In resolving that question, the Court “applied the four-factor test announced in [United States v.] [read post]