Search for: "United States v. Posner" Results 181 - 200 of 733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am by Rahul Bhagnari
Two years to the day after the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:33 pm by Richard Posner
  In 1967 the Supreme Court, in a case called Loving v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 2:43 am by Florian Mueller
The Apple-Samsung award needs to be adjusted here and there, but the CMU-Marvell award must simply be tossed or slashed in order to protect the innovation economy against patent unreasonableness.The cross-appeal of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:44 am by Florian Mueller
On March 20, 2013 Microsoft requested permission to submit an amicus curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on the standard-essential patents (SEPs) part of the "Posner appeal" (Apple v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:20 am by Amy Howe
United States and what it might ultimately mean for the president’s power to raise the debt limit on his own in a future crisis. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:43 am
Johnson, 491 U.S. 197 (1989), and United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
We focus first on the landmark 1813 case Queen v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 2:57 am by David Lynn
The IRRC Institute and ISS recently announced that they are jointly conducting a study of the state of issuer-investor engagement in the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 12:40 pm by Florian Mueller
Judge Holderman also compares the number he arrived at with a jury award in Ericsson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:49 am by Florian Mueller
Samsung's counsel had argued all along that Apple should be bound to Judge Posner's 2012 claim construction in Apple v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 11:20 pm by Florian Mueller
Another amicus curiae brief has been filed in connection with Google's appeal of the FRAND part of Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
On Saturday afternoon, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled unconstitutional the District’s absolute prohibition on the carrying of handguns outside the home for lawful self-defense, in the case of Palmer v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:00 am by Suzanne Ilene Schiller
Since the United States Supreme Court decided Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]