Search for: "United States v. Powell" Results 221 - 240 of 827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
Louis School of LawLynda Dodd,  City College of New York, Colin Powell School for Civic and Global LeadershipMary Ziegler, Florida State University College of LawCo-Moderator: Tracy A. [read post]
In Limekiln, Plaintiff held unleased unitized acreage that was serviced by the HA RA SUKK; Powell 15H No. 1 and the HOSS RA SUA; Powell 15H No. 1 (collectively referred to by Plaintiff as the “Unit Well. [read post]
In Limekiln, Plaintiff held unleased unitized acreage that was serviced by the HA RA SUKK; Powell 15H No. 1 and the HOSS RA SUA; Powell 15H No. 1 (collectively referred to by Plaintiff as the “Unit Well. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
That agency is the Federal Reserve, the central bank of the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Nixon and Kissinger negotiated the Paris Peace Accords and ended the Vietnam War for the United States in January 1973. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 4:22 am
Opinion below (08-1175, Supreme Court of Florida)Petition for certiorari (08-1175)Brief in opposition (08-1175) Docket: 08-1224Title: United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 8:57 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
SUSA’s software was hacked; and that SUSA had been banned from participating in prior elections in the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003) (upholding criminal punishment for true threats); United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:25 pm
Spain, 209 F.3d 713, 715-16 (8th Cir.2000) (adopting continuing seizure approach); United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
That left Di Palma v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR CD149 and Wood v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR CD69, both of which found court as public authority not an issue when the court “merely provided a forum for the determination of the civil right in dispute between the parties”. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:59 am by South Florida Lawyers
Because “tribal sovereign immunity may not be asserted against the United States” in such a case, the Tribe’s immunity argument fails as a matter of law and the enforceability of the Summons at issue must be assessed in accordance with the framework articulated by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]