Search for: "United States v. Powell"
Results 241 - 260
of 829
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2010, 6:59 am
Because “tribal sovereign immunity may not be asserted against the United States” in such a case, the Tribe’s immunity argument fails as a matter of law and the enforceability of the Summons at issue must be assessed in accordance with the framework articulated by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
From Khalil v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:31 am
The Supreme Court on June 19 unanimously vacated and remanded an Eleventh Circuit per curiam decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 3:56 pm
Professor Michael McConnell points me to United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:48 pm
See, United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 pm
She then looks to United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
The case that established that principle, Powell v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 3:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:39 am
United States Subscription RequiredU.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 8:47 pm
Du v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 5:15 am
Thornton, 514 U.S. 779, 783 (1995) (first quoting Powell v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Because Justice Powell's sole vote in the 4-1-4 split cannot set a precedent. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
In this respect, the Court recalls its case-law to the effect that a Contracting State is considered to retain Convention liability in respect of treaty commitments and other agreements between States subsequent to the entry into force of the Convention (see, for example, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, §§ 126-128, ECHR 2010-…). [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:45 am
Twenty five years ago yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued one if its most shameful opinions in recent history: McCleskey v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:43 pm
State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
United States, 41 Journal of Supreme Court History 21-38 (2016).Symposium on LGBT Antidiscrimination Law and Policy After Hobby Lobby. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Véase Pueblo v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
