Search for: "United States v. Powell"
Results 301 - 320
of 770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2012, 2:53 am
§ 1030(a)(2) is “a fine . . . or imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or both,” if the offense “was committed in furtherance of any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States”. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
Flood v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 3:48 pm
Dugger or the United States Supreme Court cases set forth by Mr. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Although it was the product of a 2-1 split decision, the ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:46 pm
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Liberty University v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 3:25 pm
The Third Circuit struck again in Cassidy Powell Lynch, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:16 am
See also Pennsylvania State Police v. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 8:44 am
United States | Oyez Miranda v. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
My supportive example from the current Supreme Court is United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:37 pm
Texas) and Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 9:06 am
Title VI states: No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 12:35 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeDeportee's Sentence Vacatur Motion Denied; Claim Would Have Been Successive Habeas Petition United States v. [read post]
6 May 2025, 4:00 am
Chief Justice Roberts in Seila Law v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 10:33 am
United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:50 am
Estate of Johnson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 6:30 am
Jefferson Powell To turn now to the reviews, Jeff Powell’s post offers several supportive observations: he suggests that the general need for balance in the law reinforces my proposal’s legitimacy, he points to the majority opinion on gun rights in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 6:29 am
The exclusive jurisdiction provision in the Alberta statute did not divest the district court of its jurisdiction, because only the Constitution and the laws of the United States can dictate what cases or controversies U.S. federal courts may hear. [read post]
