Search for: "United States v. Powell" Results 21 - 40 of 829
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2023, 5:24 am by Guest Author
 United States, 412 U.S. 521 (1973) Carlson v. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  They made no distinction between an officer, which included the president, an officer of the United States, and an officer under the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[4] The Climate Principles follow other climate-related standards and initiatives within and outside the United States that together reinforce that the public and private sectors are continuing to focus on risks arising from climate change. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:10 am by Unknown
The bill, Ending Corporate Influence on Elections Act of 2023, would “begin to undo” the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Although Willis, acting for Fulton County and the state of Georgia, has no power to grant Powell or Chesebro any kind of immunity against federal prosecution, pursuant to the SCOTUS decisions in Murphy v. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 3:51 am by jonathanturley
Moreover, the courts have rejected the use of exclusion in Powell v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 5:47 am by Unknown
By Lene Powell, J.D.Crypto assets are causing “a lot of risk and harm to investors” and institutional investors should be careful about acting as statutory underwriters, said David Hirsch, chief of the SEC Crypto Assets and Cyber Unit, Division of Enforcement. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm by Josh Blackman
I have now had a chance to read the entire 45-page indictment in United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am by Eric Goldman
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]