Search for: "United States v. Price"
Results 321 - 340
of 5,790
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2018, 1:20 am
On 10 July 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rendered its judgment in the matter of Alan Philipps et al. v. the Federal Republic of Germany and the Stiftung Preussischer Kulturbesitz. [read post]
3 May 2017, 10:47 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 7:13 am
United States (1908) and Indian trust doctrine under United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:25 pm
The respondents then attempted to satisfy the judgment by attaching accounts in the United States held by (among others) Bank Melli. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Services, Inc. v A.G. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:16 pm
The preliminary injunction issued on July 4, 2023, by the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana … as modified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on October 3, 2023 … is stayed. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:19 am
United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
This imports the sequencing familiar in the Chevron context from United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 10:40 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
United States, 370 U. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:26 am
The case of Marine Travelift, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 8:42 am
The United States Supreme Court declined to review the Court’s ruling last month. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
Neither [United States v.] [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
In essence, the CBIA’s challenge was based on the “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine from the Supreme Court of the United States’ Nollan v California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:28 am
And as reported in the March 31, 2009 Post, the state attorneys general of New York, Illinois and Michigan obtained a consent decree against Herman Miller in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for resale price maintenance involving the Aeron chair. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 5:51 pm
For example, there were no allegations of global marketing, that defendants monitored prices in other markets, or allegations of actual pricing or changes in pricing of elevators in the United States attributable to defendants' alleged European misconduct. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:00 am
By Caitlin Forsyth Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:44 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:44 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
