Search for: "United States v. Price" Results 321 - 340 of 5,302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2007, 8:02 am
Earlier this week, the qui tam case of  United States ex. rel.Louanne Boothe v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 2:39 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The court explained that in that situation, “pricing and contracting negotiations in the United States alone do not constitute or transform those extraterritorial activities into a sale within the United States for purposes of §271(a). [read post]
16 May 2019, 12:15 pm by Eric Caligiuri
PEPPER ET AL., case number 17-204, the United States Supreme Court considered a case alleging Apple has monopolized the retail market for the sale of apps and has unlawfully used its monopolistic power to charge consumers higher-than competitive prices. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 6:47 pm
The payments the trustee did make were made in U.S. dollars, beneficiaries being resident in the United States. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:28 pm by Michael H. Payne and Casey J. McKinnon
United States provides hope to contractors that incur higher than anticipated costs on a requirements contract or, alternatively, on construction contracts where line item prices are based on estimated quantities. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 6:13 pm
  The case is significant in that, for now, despite the long-standing rule to the contrary in the seminal United States Supreme Court case of Hanover Shoe v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 11:37 am by admin
In Quality King, the copyrighted items in question had all been manufactured in the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 9:14 am by Adam Schlossman
The Court asked the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in two cases: Title: United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:53 pm by Mac
” – Chief Justice Roberts Last Wednesday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Snyder v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:32 pm
McKesson Corp., 573 F.Supp.2d 431 (Aug. 26, 2008), the District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissed a national class action antitrust complaint, borrowing from the recent United States Supreme Court decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Antitrust Today
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has denied plaintiffs’ motion to reconsider its September 16 2010, ruling that plaintiffs in the ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation have no standing to pursue their price fixing claims against an ATM network and a group of banks. [read post]