Search for: "United States v. Price"
Results 341 - 360
of 5,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 9:14 am
The Court asked the Acting Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in two cases: Title: United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:32 pm
McKesson Corp., 573 F.Supp.2d 431 (Aug. 26, 2008), the District Court for the District of Massachusetts dismissed a national class action antitrust complaint, borrowing from the recent United States Supreme Court decisions in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 5:10 pm
See Charles Schwab Corp. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
See Indictment, United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:06 pm
One of the most famous censorship cases to land in the courts is United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
Class representatives and their counsel in the Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation have won another initial round in their suit alleging that Chinese vitamin C manufacturers conspired to fix prices and to limit the output of vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 10:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:36 pm
The parties in the case are engaged in the manufacture, sale, and distribution of bottled water in the Southeastern United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:44 am
Costco v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 12:16 pm
(Opinion, United States Supreme Court)... [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:09 am
VIP PRODUCTS LLC (Opinion, United States Supreme Court) Agencies issue fina... [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:04 am
Georgie Court of Appeals Reverses Leggett v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:31 am
Friend, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously agreed that a corporations “principal place of business,” for purposes of determining whether federal courts have diversity jurisdiction (that is, all parties on one side of the versus (“v”) sign are from states different from all parties on the opposite side) to hear a case. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:59 am
The United States Supreme Court has declined to hear an appeal by Sony Music, Vivendi, Warner Music and EMI, in Sony Music v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
District Judge in Seattle ruled that transporting and reselling unaltered “Trader Joe’s” branded products in Canada does not give rise to a lawsuit for trademark infringement in the United States under U.S. trademark laws. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:55 am
In Price v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 6:30 am
The second is the potential for increased price regulation on pharmaceuticals in the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 2:24 pm
In the United States, Porsche does have a registration for "Cayman" in trademark international class 025 for numerous clothing items and it specifically includes FOOTWEAR. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 11:18 am
In State of California v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:23 pm
Case: M Waikiki v. [read post]
