Search for: "United States v. Price" Results 21 - 40 of 5,776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2009, 11:05 am
Judge Stephen Reinhardt (right) delivers a remarkable Brady decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 17-421 Filed: December 27, 2018 ALICE KIMBLE, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:38 am by Liskow & Lewis
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that the United States Department of the Interior violated the Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (“RRA”) by imposing price threshold conditions that require federal lessees to pay royalties when commodity prices rise. [read post]
14 May 2009, 9:51 pm
United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) the Supreme Court of the United States found Standard Oil guilty of entering into contracts in restraint of trade and monopolizing the petroleum industry through a long convoluted series of anticompetitive actions. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Elise Haverman
The COVID-19 pandemic created a run on certain personal hygiene products due to the fear of a widespread outbreak in the United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:53 am
On July 25, 2015, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued the much-anticipated ruling on class certification in Erica P. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:14 am by Docket Navigator
The potential difficulty inherent in collecting damages from a foreign defendant with limited assets in the United States supports a finding of irreparable harm. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 11:38 am
A unanimous panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has held that the United States Department of the Interior violated the Outer Continental Shelf Deep Water Royalty Relief Act (“RRA”) by imposing price threshold conditions that require federal lessees to pay royalties when commodity prices rise. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:00 pm by Dykema
On September 29, 2016, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in the matter of Expressions Hair Design et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 9:15 am by Antonio Curvello
This focus is particularly alarming for international companies with subsidiaries in Brazil because Brazil’s IP royalty remittance laws directly conflict with the United State’s transfer pricing policies. [read post]